Senators seek more details on Amtrak service, job cuts

In three letters, 16 senators ask specifics of costs justifying end of daily long-distance service, criteria for its restoration
RELATED TOPICS: PASSENGER | AMTRAK | POLITICS | CORONAVIRUS | LEGISLATION
Trains Industry Newsletter
Get a weekly roundup of the industry news you need.
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine. View our privacy policy.
U.S. Sen. Roger Wicker arrives on the City of New Orleans for the Marks, Miss., station dedication in May, 2018. Wicker authored one of three letters from senators to Amtrak CEO Bill Flynn asking for more details on plans to end daily long-distance service on 12 routes.
Bob Johnston
WASHINGTON — Sixteen U.S. Senators have pushed back against Amtrak’s plan to reduce 12 daily long-distance trains to triweekly departures and cut its workforce by 20%.

In three separate letters to President and CEO William Flynn sent late last week, the lawmakers strongly hinted they were unwilling to grant the company’s request for an additional $1.475 billion in fiscal 2021 without obtaining more details that explain how costs and revenues would be affected by the reductions. [See “Amtrak plans triweekly service for almost all long-distance trains as of Oct. 1,” Trains News Wire, June 15, 2020].

The inquiries by nine Republicans and seven Democrats — representing Montana, North Dakota, West Virginia, Colorado, Nevada, Wisconsin, Mississippi, and Indiana — follow proposed Amtrak oversight legislation recently passed by the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.

Among recently added “managers amendments” to the “INVEST in America Act” [see “House committee releases new five-year transportation legislation,” Trains News Wire, June 5] before a floor vote are directives ordering Amtrak to maintain existing long-distance frequencies throughout the next fiscal year; provide ticket-selling and baggage-handling capability, not just agents, at 15 stations where Congressional appropriators had already demanded personnel be rehired; and ensure food service is available to all passengers and remains unchanged until a proposed Food and Beverage Working Group issues recommendations.

A letter obtained by Trains News Wire penned by U.S. Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), chairman of the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, asks to see what data Amtrak is using to justify long-distance reductions and the benchmarks that will trigger a specific plan for reinstating daily trains.

“We would like to ensure that reductions in frequencies for long-distance routes do not unnecessarily extend beyond the COVID-19 crisis,” it says.

U.S. Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), who is up for re-election this year, and his six bipartisan co-signers say Amtrak’s proposal “raises serious doubts about whether a realistic plan exists for fully restoring service in a timely fashion.”

Triweekly service, his letter adds, “will eliminate thousands of points of connection and dramatically reduce the utility of Amtrak as a transportation provider, irrevocably hurting hundreds of communities and small towns already devastated by the COVID-19 pandemic.” The Daines letter, like Wicker’s, asks about metrics Amtrak will use to decide when daily service would return, but also wonders what Amtrak considers “adequate funding” that the company says it will need to restore frequencies.

Fellow Montana U.S. Sen. Jon Tester and Democrats from West Virginia and Nevada found the negative effects of reduced service and connections to rural communities such as Havre, Mont.; Elko, Nev.; and Prince, W. Va., “particularly egregious when Amtrak’s long-distance [trains] provided double the revenue of state-supported routes or the Northeast Corridor in May.” It also asks for conditions and timelines for restoring daily service, as well as “the costs associated with the reduction and resumption of service.”    

Asked about the upcoming cuts in a Washington Post livestream interview Monday morning, Flynn did not the address cost or revenue impacts but said the Oct. 1 date was chosen because winter “is the time we have the lowest level of ridership on the long distance network. Then we will be evaluating those trains and other indicators, and our ability to restore service on a service-by-service plan as we come into the spring and … into the summer, which is the highest level of ridership.

“We’re looking at bookings and level of ridership; we’ll just have to look at where we are in terms of COVID-19 and the pandemic — God forbid there is a second wave. And we also want to understand Amtrak’s financial condition, and just broader level demand for Amtrak and air services, for example.” He said the company would “certainly” be communicating its criteria and plans for restoring long-distance service “to the representative committees and very interested members on [Capitol] Hill.” 

Leave a Comment
Want to leave a comment?
Only registered members of TrainsMag.com are allowed to leave comments. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Login or Register now.
Please keep your feedback on-topic and respectful. Trains staffers reserve the right to edit or delete any comments.
0 COMMENTS
FREE DOWNLOAD

FREE DOWNLOAD

Complex railroad locations.

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy
Subscribe Up To 54% off the newsstand price!
Subscribe To Trains Mag Today
+