Class I roads make official their desire for one-man crews

Opening move in labor negotiations likely to meet stiff resistance
Trains Industry Newsletter
Get a weekly roundup of the industry news you need.
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine. View our privacy policy.
Crew_Labor_Lassen
A crew member returns to the locomotive after lining a switch at Canadian Pacific's yard in Bensenville, Ill. Class I railroads have formally introduced a proposal for one-man crews on road trains.
TRAINS: David Lassen

WASHINGTON — After hinting at it for months, Class I railroads have officially asked that single-person crews be part of a new national contract with a coalition of a dozen labor unions.

The request — formally outlined in the Section 6 notice issued last Friday [see "Freight railroads issue bargaining notice to unions to launch new rounds of labor talks," Trains News Wire, Nov. 1, 2019] — will undoubtedly be met with stiff resistance from union officials who say single-person crews are a non-starter.

In the seven-page Section 6 notice, railroads call for conductors to be taken out of the locomotive cab to become a “ground-based” position. The Section 6 notice was issued by the National Carriers' Conference Committee, representing BNSF Railway, CSX Transportation, Kansas City Southern, Norfolk Southern, Union Pacific and the U.S. railroads owned directly or indirectly by Canadian National. The plan is similar to one that BNSF Railway negotiated with SMART-TD General Committee GO-001 back in 2014 that called for having a single-person aboard each train and a conductor in an automobile working with multiple trains on a specific territory. That proposal was later rejected by a 5-to-1 margin in a committee-wide vote.

In the new notice, the railroads argue that single-person crews are necessary for the industry to remain competitive.

“Perhaps the most glaring example of our need for modernization concerns the size and makeup of train crews,” the notice reads. “In order to take full advantage of new investments in modern technology, reduce human error and better align operational costs with other industries, railroads propose to redeploy conductors from the cab of the locomotive to ground-based positions on territories where PTC or equivalent technologies are enabled. Redeploying employees to ground-based positions in these territories will safely and more efficiently meet the industry’s operational and service requirements while providing those employees with higher quality-of-life jobs that allow more employees to spend their nights at home after shifts rather than at hotels.”

Unions counter that the push toward single-person crews is instead a way to eliminate jobs while increasing the dangers facing the employees that remain.

Earlier this fall, a coalition of railroads sued SMART-TD in federal court alleging that the union was refusing to negotiate on crew size at the national level. The union argues that crew size should be dealt with at the local level with individual union branches.

— Updated at 2:30 p.m. CST to clarify railroads involved in the Section 6 notice.

Leave a Comment
Want to leave a comment?
Only registered members of TrainsMag.com are allowed to leave comments. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Login or Register now.
Please keep your feedback on-topic and respectful. Trains staffers reserve the right to edit or delete any comments.
0 COMMENTS
FREE DOWNLOAD

FREE DOWNLOAD

Complex railroad locations.

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy
Subscribe Up To 54% off the newsstand price!
Subscribe To Trains Mag Today
+