Indiana Rail Road, rail industry groups, sue Illinois over mandatory crew size law

Law supporters claim that Federal government has yet to regulate crew size, so state law may apply
Trains Industry Newsletter
Get a weekly roundup of the industry news you need.
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine. View our privacy policy.
Indiana
CHICAGO, Ill. — The Indiana Rail Road is taking the debate over laws requiring minimum crew sizes for freight trains to federal court in Illinois.

According to a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division, Indiana Rail Road, along with railroad industry advocacy groups the Association of American Railroads and the American Short Line and Regional Rail Road Association, are seeking judgement against the Illinois Commerce Commission over the state’s new “Crew Size Law.” According the lawsuit, the railroad and the two groups are asking the court to prevent the ICC from enforcing Illinois’ Crew Size Law and declare that the law is invalid and unenforceable.

The lawsuit was filed in federal court on Sept. 30. According to the filing, the Crew Size Law will take effect in Illinois on Jan. 1, 2020. A statement from the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen says the law was signed by Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker on Aug. 2 and provides that “no rail carrier shall operate a train or light engine used in connection with the movement of freight unless it has an operating crew consisting of at least two individuals. (The law) provides that the minimum freight train crew size shall remain in effect until a federal law or rule encompassing the subject matter has been adopted.”

The BLET lobbied for the passage of the law and praised officials who helped see it through the legislative process. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit, however, claim that the Crew Size Law “defies federal authority over railroads” and is “preempted by the Federal Railroad Safety Act” which sets no standard for minimum train crew size. The Illinois law “is void and unenforceable under its own terms,” the lawsuit claims.

Minimum crew size has been under debate over the past several years. As summarized in a report by business analysis publication Crain’s Chicago Business, the issue has been hot-button since the 2013 Lac-Mégantic, Quebec, derailment and explosion that killed 47 people in Canada. Despite the Federal Railroad Administration scotcing a proposal earlier this year which, among other issues, would have addressed crew size, Illinois, along with Colorado and Nevada, passed crew size laws. The lawsuit claims that minimum crew size has been determined for decades by collective bargaining and not by the passage of laws at the federal or state level.

The success of the Indiana Rail Road lawsuit against the Illinois Commerce Commission could have far-reaching effect and its outcome could be cited in further potential litigation over the crew size issue. The lawsuit also says the result could impact the success of the nation’s railroads, which could reduce labor costs by reducing crew size. Failure of the court to overrule the crew size law would come at significant cost to railroads and could stifle innovation amongst rail carriers, the lawsuit says.

The lawsuit also claims that railroads are safer now than ever before, even while some carriers, including Indiana Rail Road, have been using single-person crews. The lawsuit states several times that the FRA has not found any conclusive evidence that single-person crews are less safe than crews of two or more people, nor has the agency found reason to mandate crews of two of more people.

Indiana Rail Road has been operating one-person crews for two decades “where it makes operational sense,” according to the lawsuit, and “INRD’s experience and data confirm that one-person crews are just as safe as multiple-person crews.”

The lawsuit also cites drastic safety improvements over the past two decades, including a 36-percent reduction in accident rates since 2000 and a 48-percent reduction in rail employee injuries since 2000.

“Recent years have been the safest in rail history,” the lawsuit says.

According to the lawsuit, INRD and the two groups seek a declaration that the Illinois Crew Size Law is in violation of, and is pre-empted by the Federal Railroad Safety Act and is unenforceable. The plaintiffs also seek a permanent injunction prohibiting the ICC from enforcing the law against INRD, the two groups or the groups’ members, which include all of the nation’s Class I railroads and a myriad of Class II and Class III railroads.

According to federal filings, the Illinois Commerce Commission has not yet filed a response to the lawsuit.
Leave a Comment
Want to leave a comment?
Only registered members of TrainsMag.com are allowed to leave comments. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Login or Register now.
Please keep your feedback on-topic and respectful. Trains staffers reserve the right to edit or delete any comments.
0 COMMENTS
FREE DOWNLOAD

FREE DOWNLOAD

The Genesee & Wyoming 

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy
Subscribe Up To 58% off the newsstand price!
Subscribe To Trains Mag Today
+