America's Transit Challenge: Part IV

The case for capitalism to support transit and passenger services in the United States
Trains Industry Newsletter
Get a weekly roundup of the industry news you need.
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine. View our privacy policy.
Brightline_Miami_01
A Brightline train approaches MiamiCentral station on new track on May 11, 2018.
Bob Johnston
This article is the fourth of five on transit in the U.S. and North America. Read parts One, Two, Three, and Five online.

The Sunshine State: tourists flocking to Orlando, college kids on spring break, retirees riding golf carts, international partiers dancing until dawn at Miami Beach nightclubs. Florida casually mixes old and new.

America’s oldest city is St. Augustine, which Henry Flagler found deficient in transportation and so created the Florida East Coast Railway.

Along its tracks now run something new, yet old: private-sector, for-profit passenger trains, largely absent from American rails for many decades. It was Brightline, but is now Virgin Trains USA, running between Miami and West Palm Beach, and maybe someday to Orlando.

In its inaugural year of 2018, the new railroad carried 579,000 passengers as it built out its service.

“Our business model has always focused on city pairs that are too short to fly and too far to drive,” says Ben Porritt, senior vice president of corporate affairs at Virgin Trains USA. That equates to end points 200 to 400 miles apart. Rail often gets 15-30% market share in those corridors, Porritt says, adding that they are “highly profitable.”

Ramping up in 2018, the company recorded a net loss of $117 million and loss on operations of $110 million, financial statement copies provided to Trains. With the Miami-to-Orlando segment expected to be in full operation by 2023, Virgin Trains USA projects revenue of $567 million with $385 million in pre-tax profits.

Fares account for about 86% of projected income, with the rest coming from ancillary revenue.

“We own our station experience and we own our onboard experience,” says Porritt. That allows Virgin to profit from food and merchandise sales, advertising, sponsorships, and space rental at their stations.

“Ancillary revenue becomes a piece of this puzzle that others can’t count on," he says.

There’s another big piece as well: real estate development at and around key stations.

Florida East Coast Industries, parent of Brightline, is developing a six-block office, retail, and residential center surrounding the new downtown Miami station, branded as Virgin MiamiCentral. Two residential high-rises are under construction and two completed office towers were sold in April for $159 million. In West Palm Beach, they’ve built a 24-story luxury apartment and retail tower. The company is also eyeing development in Fort Lauderdale and Tampa.

“We look at this as more than simply a transportation business,” Porritt says.

The globally known Virgin brand appears on airliners, hotels, cruise ships, and luxury retreats. It operates tours and safaris. That brings a wide range of ways to cross-sell Virgin customers. Think: a tourist flies Virgin Atlantic to Orlando, takes a Virgin train to Miami and departs on a Virgin Holiday Cruise.

Already looking beyond Florida, the company acquired XpressWest, a stillborn project to build high speed passenger rail between Las Vegas and Victorville, Calif., about 90 minutes by car from Los Angeles. Virgin already owns the Hard Rock Hotel in Las Vegas, which it will reopen next year as a Virgin Hotel, and is looking ahead to development around its planned station in the casino capital.

TexasCentral
Texas Central's logo
High Speed in Texas
As Virgin Trains seeks to fulfill its ambitions in Florida and California, other investors are looking to lay rails in Texas for a 200-mph train connecting Dallas and Houston.

“The market makes sense from a high speed rail perspective,” says Texas Central chief investment officer Tim Keith. Before selecting that route, they looked at 97 city pairs in the U.S. from a business-case perspective. Their research found that 16 million trips a year are taken between Texas’ two largest cities, with 90% by car. Most of those are end-to-end.

At 240 miles, it’s a long drive. The train’s planned 90-minute schedule time will cut that considerably. And Texas Central will be able to compete with air travel, Keith says, given weather delays and the inherent time penalties for security screening, boarding, and deplaning.

Unlike Virgin, which has trackage rights on Florida East Coast Railway and will mostly build to Orlando alongside existing highways, lowering construction costs, Texas Central will have to establish and build its own right-of-way from the ground up.

Estimated start-up costs are at least $15 billion, Keith tells Trains. But he adds that the sparsely populated, flat topography between Houston and Dallas will help reduce costs.

To attract investors, the venture not only needs to cover the costs of operations, “but also the cost of servicing the capital required to build the infrastructure,” Keith says.

Keith acknowledges that 100% private funding doesn’t work for every project.

“That will ultimately come down to the size of the market and the risks inherent in that market,” he says. “But that will create the opportunity for PPPs as well as straight private investment.”

By that, Keith is referring to public-private partnerships, also known as P3s.
Denver_RTD_Cars_Lassen
A Denver RTD train.
TRAINS: David Lassen
Denver’s Big P3
Public-private partnerships can lower upfront costs and shift risks to the private sector. These often take the form of design-build or operations-and-maintenance contracts.

The largest transit public-private partnership in the U.S. is Denver’s Eagle P3 project, which this year completed the last of three new commuter rail lines. The $2.2-billion undertaking included $1.03 billion in federal funding and $450 million in private financing, and was delivered within budget.

A group called Denver Transit Partners, led by Fluor, entered into a 34-year agreement in 2010 with the Denver Regional Transportation District to design, build, finance, operate, and maintain 40 miles of electric rail service on three lines. The contract also included 56 commuter rail cars along with a new maintenance facility.

LA Metro has three current rail transit projects under way as design-build delivery projects and two others are being studied for P3. These include the proposed Sepulveda Transit Corridor linking the San Fernando Valley and LAX, and the West Santa Ana branch, a future light rail line that would connect downtown LA to southeast Los Angeles County.

Not all projects qualify for P3. Nadine Lee, LA Metro’s chief of staff, says they carefully evaluate each potential project and explains that they look to the private sector to “deliver outcomes more so than just projects.”

She also points out that these partnerships bring another welcome benefit: “We want to leverage the P3 opportunities because it may help us free up cash flow to do other projects.”

Growing interest from capitalists signals new funding opportunities for passenger rail transportation. But private investors won’t risk their money if they don’t expect a return on their investment.
Leave a Comment
Want to leave a comment?
Only registered members of TrainsMag.com are allowed to leave comments. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Login or Register now.
Please keep your feedback on-topic and respectful. Trains staffers reserve the right to edit or delete any comments.
0 COMMENTS
ROAD TO OBLIVION

ROAD TO OBLIVION

Free download

SEE INSIDE THIS ISSUE

Learn more about the stories and photos in this months issue

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy
Subscribe Up To 54% off the newsstand price!
Subscribe To Trains Mag Today
+