Rose continues assault on Precision Scheduled Railroading

Trains Industry Newsletter
Get a weekly roundup of the industry news you need.
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine. View our privacy policy.
MattRose2019
BNSF Executive Chairman Matt Rose
TRAINS: David Lassen
LOMBARD, Ill. — Matt Rose continues spiking hard on Precision Scheduled Railroading. Speaking before the Midwest Association of Rail Shippers on Wednesday, BNSF Railway's executive chairman laid out additional considerations and problems he sees with the continued roll-out of PSR.

He spoke candidly on the topic a week earlier at the National Railroad Construction Conference at Marco Island, Fla. 

This time, he noted that the regulatory risk from PSR railroads’ tendency to “rationalize” (or stop serving) some intermodal lines threatens the railroad’s intermodal business in two ways.

“One is that right now, the [Surface Transportation Board] doesn’t even regulate intermodal. I think if we all of sudden start saying to public policy makers … we’re going to de-market all these lanes, [they will say] well, wait a minute; we want the STB to be involved in these businesses," he says.

“And the second thing is … all this stuff about pushing back on truck size and weight, that a lot of people in this room would like to see? We’ve given up the opening door to say, ‘Well, if the railroads aren’t going to handle it, then, yeah, the trucks ought to be able to haul triples, or 130,000 pounds, or this, or that.”

Rose also questioned Precision Scheduled Railroading’s goals of scheduled trains and “balanced movements” — the ideas that trains run at the same time every day, and that every train in one direction must have a corresponding train in the other direction.

“For some of our businesses, we can do that,” he said, addressing the first point. “When coal comes out of the [Powder River] Basin, we get a call three hours in advance when a train’s loaded. We’ve got to put a crew in there. If we say, well, we’re not going to haul that load of coal until 1800, because that’s the scheduled time, they won’t be able to put the next empty under the spigot. We won’t get the next load. With intermodal, with international, when these big steamships come in, 15,000 TEUs [20-foot equivalent units, the measure of intermodal volume using 20-foot containers], it is a mad dash to get these trains loaded and get them out.

“When you hear this balance issue, this argument, look at the trade differences in our society today. It’s about 65-35 [the split of incoming versus outgoing volume]. We’re never going to be balanced at our railroad. Now, maybe every other railroad can be balanced. Best wishes. … This idea of balancing, it’s not going to work on our network.

“So I think you have to really be careful with what is PSR, and what is going to impact the customers. Is it going to make a better cost, and a better service for customers? If it is, count me in, I’m all for it.”

See Trains' earlier story on Matt Rose's comments on rail automation. 
Leave a Comment
Want to leave a comment?
Only registered members of TrainsMag.com are allowed to leave comments. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Login or Register now.
Please keep your feedback on-topic and respectful. Trains staffers reserve the right to edit or delete any comments.
0 COMMENTS
FREE DOWNLOAD

FREE DOWNLOAD

Complex railroad locations.

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy
Subscribe Up To 54% off the newsstand price!
Subscribe To Trains Mag Today
+