Attorneys general oppose Trump administration plan to move LNG by rail

RELATED TOPICS: REGULATION | FREIGHT | SAFETY | POLITICS
Trains Industry Newsletter
Get a weekly roundup of the industry news you need.
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine. View our privacy policy.
Trains' Washington Watch logo
WASHINGTON — Attorneys general from 15 states and the District of Columbia have come out against a Trump administration proposal to allow the movement of liquified natural gas by rail.

Last year, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration and the Federal Railroad Administration began to seek public comment on the proposal to move LNG in DOT-113 tank cars. Liquified natural gas can currently move by truck, or by rail only in a portable tank, with approval by the FRA

On Jan. 13, a coalition of attorneys general came out against the proposal in comments filed with federal regulators.

“Here in Maryland, we need only remember the Howard Street Tunnel Fire of 2001 to know that sending hazardous materials along our rail lines can have catastrophic consequences," says Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh.

The 2001 derailment in Baltimore of a 60-car CSX Transportation train sparked a blaze that burned for hours and consumed multiple cargoes including paper, pulp products, hydrochloric acid, and propylene glycol. 

In addition to Maryland, the comment letter was signed by the attorneys general of 14 states and the District of Columbia.

In June 2019, the House of Representatives passed an amendment trying to prohibit the U.S. Department of Transportation from issuing permits to move LNG by rail. The amendment was in response to an executive order that directed the Secretary of Transportation to finalize a rule that would “treat LNG the same as other cryogenic liquids and permit LNG to be transported in approved rail cars.”

In December, PHMSA granted a special permit to Energy Transport Solutions LLC to move LNG in DOT-113 tank cars from Wyalusing, Pa., and Gibbstown, N.J. The move was quickly blasted by U.S. Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., chair of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, who says the decision to issue the permit was “reckless”.
Leave a Comment
Want to leave a comment?
Only registered members of TrainsMag.com are allowed to leave comments. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Login or Register now.
Please keep your feedback on-topic and respectful. Trains staffers reserve the right to edit or delete any comments.
0 COMMENTS
FREE DOWNLOAD

FREE DOWNLOAD

The beauty and complexity of trains in the snow.

SEE INSIDE THIS ISSUE

Learn more about the stories and photos in this months issue

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy
Subscribe Up To 54% off the newsstand price!
Subscribe To Trains Mag Today
+